| Factors for Determining If
a Business Is Not Engaged in for Profit Generally, an activity
qualifies as a business if it is carried on with
the reasonable expectation of earning a
profit. In order to make this
determination, the IRS feels taxpayers should
consider the following factors:
Does the time and effort put
into the activity indicate an intention to make a
profit?
Does
the taxpayer depend on income from the activity?
If
there are losses, are they due to circumstances
beyond the taxpayers control or did they
occur in the start-up phase of the business?
Has
the taxpayer changed methods of operation to
improve profitability?
Does
the taxpayer or his or her advisors have the
knowledge needed to carry on the activity as a
successful business?
Has
the taxpayer made a profit in similar activities
in the past?
Does
the activity make a profit in some years?
Can
the taxpayer expect to make a profit in the
future from the appreciation of assets used in
the activity?
The presumption
test: The IRS presumes that an activity
is carries on for profit if it makes a profit
during at least three of the last five tax years,
including the current year (at least two of the
last seven years for activities that consist
primarily of breeding, showing, training, or
racing horses).
Tax results if
activity is a hobby: If an activity is
not for profit, losses from that activity may not
be used to offset other income.The limit on
not-for-profit losses applies to individuals,
partnerships, estates, trusts, and S
corporations. It does not apply to corporations
other than S corporations.
Deductions for
hobby activities are claimed as itemized
deductions on Schedule A (Form 1040): These
hobby loss deductions must be taken in the
following order and only to the extent stated in
each of three categories:
Deductions
that a taxpayer can take for personal as well as
business activities, such as home mortgage
interest and taxes, can be taken in full.
Deductions
that dont result in an adjustment to basis,
such as advertising, insurance premiums, and
wages, can be taken next, to the extent gross
income for the activity is more than the
deductions from the first category.
Business
deductions that reduce the basis of property,
such as depreciation and amortization, are taken
last, but only to the extent gross income for the
activity is more than the deductions taken in the
first two categories.
Example:Michael D.
Storer worked full time as a repairmen for
General Motors in Miamisburg, Ohio. Starting in
1993, on the advice of his physician to take up a
hobby to help him cope with depression, he became
interested in photography and photographic
restoration. Being self-taught, he
purchased a large amount of equipment and books,
which he deducted on a Schedule C. His wife
assisted as his bookkeeper. The court
concluded that Michael didnt demonstrate
that his photographic activity was carried on
with an actual and honest objective of making a
profit for the following reasons:
Manner
in which taxpayer carried on the activity.
Although the Storers kept very extensive and
detailed records of their expenses, but not
through a separate checking account, the court
believed that these records were maintained
solely for the purpose of substantiating their
considerable losses and not as a means for
tracing costs so as to reduce business-related
expenses. The court commented that the
extensiveness of the records would have been more
meaningful if the records illustrated that the
Storers were tracking expenses while, at the same
time, making a bona fide effort to grow their
photography enterprise. In addition, no
second telephone line existed, and the
photography equipment was insured by their
homeowners policy.
Time
and effort expended by the taxpayers.
The court did not believe Michaels claim
that he spent nearly 1,200 hours working in his
photography activity in addition to
working full time at General Motors. After
examining the daily entries in Michaels
annual time records (which did not even look to
the court as if they were prepared
contemporaneously), the court pointed out that
almost 80% of Michaels time was spent
either reading photography magazines or shopping
at retail stores. For example, in January
2001, he recorded he spent 14 hours reading
Shutterbug magazine, 8 hours reading Outdoor
photographer magazine, and 8 hours shopping at
Circuit City and CompUSA.
History
of losses and financial status. In each
year from 1996-2002, Michaels claimed
Schedule C business losses exceeded $13,000,
while his gross receipts from that same time
never exceeded $1,600 and were of limited
scope. For example, in 2001, Michael made
only 14 sales to friends and coworkers at General
Motors not to the general public.
Elements
of recreation. Probably most important
was the courts belief that Michael
principally engaged in photography as pleasurable
hobby to reduce his stress and anxiety. The
court pointed out that photography is highly
subjective, and in great part, the success of a
photography business is dependent on both the
skill and talent of the photographer and the
marketing and reputation cultivated there
from. The court was perhaps
ultimately persuaded by Michaels decision
to forgo any formal training or education in
photography in lieu of reading photography and
trade magazines, and picture books featuring
works by famed landscape photographer Ansel
Adams. While the court felt it was
beyond the courts purview to comment on
Michaels ability or potential, we think it
unlikely, barring an extraordinary talent, to
become Ansel Adams through self-study.
(Michael D. & Susan L. Storer v. Comm., TCS
2007-56)
www.westerncpe.com/June2007
|